Tracy Stoneman - Stoneman Law
Has Been Quoted In:

The Just Say No Tactic

One of the reasons I write these articles is to educate my readers about their rights and remedies when it comes to their brokerage accounts. Far too many people with brokerage accounts are unaware of the strict rules and regulations which brokers and firms must follow and the potential violations that can occur. You would be surprised, for example, how many people dont know that in a non-discretionary account, the broker must discuss in detail each and every trade with the client prior to the transaction, including number of shares, price, and the pros and cons of the security. The SEC , on the same bandwagon, recently completed a week-long Investor Education Campaign that was broadcast by satellite nationwide. The SEC stated, "Americans are increasingly responsible for their own financial security, but many lack the basic information they need to save and invest wisely, and avoid costly mistakes."

While investors must take some responsibility for their brokerage accounts, the bulk of responsibility falls on the shoulders of the brokerage industry - after all - the brokers and managers are the ones with the securities licenses. I must often advise dejected, guilt-ridden clients that they should not blame themselves for their losses (assuming there was wrongdoing in their account).

"Just Say No"

But theres another problem brewing on the brokerage industry side - the brokerage firms routine denial of customer complaints and sometimes outright refusals to respond to customer complaints. I have one case against a New York firm called R.D. White where the customer wrote a complaint letter to the head of the firms compliance department. After he received no response, he wrote another complaint letter to the President of the company. He never received a response to either letter! This is a rare and unusual tactic better known as "Just Dont Say".

The "Just Say No" tactic is employed by most brokerage firms in dealing with a customer complaint. In more cases than not, it doesnt even matter what the customer is complaining about - the firm typically will send out a standard letter containing some or all of the following language:

  • We have discussed this matter with your broker and he assured us that you fully discussed all investments and were fully informed of the risks.
  • You are a wealthy, knowledgeable and well-informed traveler and this was time you were willing to take risks with.
  • You were very involved in the trading in the account, as evidenced by the fact that a number of the trades were your own.
  • Through the confirmations and monthly statements, you had at your disposal all of the information you needed to evaluate the account, including the level of activity and the types of investments made.
  • While we share the disappointment of your accounts performance, courts and arbitration panels alike have routinely held that brokers who make recommendations in good faith based upon publicly available information are not liable merely because the investments recommended decline in value.

What would expect them to say - "Sorry - we screwed you?" And how would you feel if you got a response letter like the above? Many of you would simply drop the matter. And that means that from the brokerage firm perspective, the "Just Say No" tactic works.

A Numbers Game

You see, for the brokerage industry, its a numbers game. Very few people catch that their broker has done something wrong. For those who do, theres a small percentage who do something about it. They blame themselves or figure they cant fight the system. Many who do take action, make the mistake of verbally complaining, instead of complaining in writing. A verbal complaint is almost always ignored because the securities regulations define a "customer complaint" as only a written complaint, not an oral one. Therefore, there is no requirement that brokerage firms even document, much less respond to or handle professionally, an oral complaint.

If you ever have a complaint or even a question about what your broker has done in your account, always put it in writing. It is most important to document your concerns if you think a broker has made at trade without first discussing it with you in detail (either the buy or the sell). That is a de facto violation, regardless of whether you thought it was okay or your broker convinced you it was okay. You can apologize to your broker verbally, but if you dont get your complaint in writing, no one is required to look into it. If you later find yourself in a lawsuit, you will be hammered by the brokerage firm for not documenting your problem.

If customers do put their complaints in writing, they are usually rebuffed with the "Just Say No" letter described above. For those who dont quit, some try to go it on their own and file their own claim. Statistics show that customers representing themselves ("pro se claimants") usually lose. Thats because they are small potatoes for the industrys high paid securities attorneys who do nothing but defend these type of cases. Some customers hire an attorney who may be experienced in litigation but not in securities fraud arbitrations. They, too, are often mincemeat for the brokerage firm attorneys.

These facts paint a grim picture and I certainly dont meant to discourage you from taking action when youve been wronged. The majority of people who get a good securities attorney to pursue their claim prevail.

A Happy Ending

A woman wrote a complaint letter to a big brokerage firm we all know. She complained that her broker had made too many unsuitable trades in her IRA account. The brokerage firm replied by sending the "Just Say No" letter (much of the above language came right out of her response letter). The woman hired an attorney and pursued her claim. Roughly one year later, the firm settled the case for a figure that was considerably more than her out-of-pocket losses. A happy ending, but how do you reconcile the settlement amount with the "Just Say No" letter? I cant. And I was her attorney.

Contact Ms. Stoneman - Stoneman Law Offices - Texas & Colorado. (800) 783-0748 Free Consultation - Representing Clients Nationwide

Ms. Stoneman is an attorney specializing in investment related complaints. Email Tracy . Preparation of this article was assisted by Douglas J. Schulz, a registered investment advisor and former stockbroker in Colorado Springs.

Client Reviews
If you suspect securities or brokerage fraud against your hard-earned investments and need an advocate, call Tracy Pride Stoneman - NOW! I was a victim of churning, improper sale of unsuitable private placements, compliance violations, and more. I blamed myself at first and didn't think I had a case, but I was referred to Tracy after another lawyer balked, thinking all was lost. She took the emotion out of it, got down to the facts, made the case, and in hands-on fashion worked hard for the best result possible. She's an excellent communicator and the kind of experienced securities arbitration lawyer you need in your corner. Ms. Stoneman achieved a settlement for me that far exceeded expectations. She has my highest recommendation. Jeffrey B.
Tracy was a wonderful lawyer in my and my husband's huge case against Prudential Securities. She was relentless in going after the stockbroker and firm, determined to obtain all of the documents that helped our case and hurt theirs (that's why the firm didn't want to produce them!). No matter what curve ball the brokerage firm threw, Tracy came up with an angle to overcome it. My husband always commented how smart Tracy was in handling our case. Throughout it all, Tracy was extremely cheerful and easy to work with - unlike most lawyers I know! Carolyn W.
I think that you did a great job for the Tylers, and I believe you are one of the most organized and effective attorneys I have worked with. John B.