Why Hire Ms. Stoneman

Tracy Image


Tracy Pride Stoneman began representing investors and stockbrokers with claims against their brokerage firms in 1992. From the outset, Ms. Stoneman became active in championing the rights of investors, for example, by publishing articles to make securities arbitrations fairer and co-authoring a book to better educate the public on the behind-the-scenes activities of brokerage firms.  She was one of the early members of the Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association and served on its Board of Directors for six years.  She has represented thousands of individuals who have been wronged by their brokerage firms. Ms. Stoneman has handled some of the largest securities arbitrations against Prudential Securities, Paine Webber and Raymond James, yet she also handles significantly smaller cases. Ms. Stoneman takes cases on an hourly basis or a contingent fee basis. She will also agree to unique, hybrid fee arrangements in order to accommodate the needs of the client - the choice is yours. Ms. Stoneman also represents stockbrokers who have claims against their brokerage firms for such things as wrongful termination and defamation on the U-4/U-5 regulatory form. 

Securities Arbitration Expertise

 Representing Investors

Securities Arbitration Expertise – 

Representing Stockbrokers

  • FINRA & SEC Regulations
  •  Breach of Fiduciary Duty
  •  Securities Fraud Investigations
  •  Mutual Fund Mismanagement
  •  Hedge Fund Mismanagement
  •  Self-Dealing & Front-Running
  •  Churning

  •  Options, Stocks & Bonds
  •  Compliance Violations
  •  Supervisory Violations and Lapses
  •  Due Diligence
  •  Concentration - Lack of Diversification
  • Suitability

  • Wrongful termination based on age, gender, race, religion, or other types of discrimination
  •  Defense of promissory note claims
  •  Breach of contract
  •  Defamation on U-4/U-5 disclosures
  •  Constructive Discharge cases
  •  Defense of FINRA disciplinary actions

One thing that distinguishes Ms. Stoneman from many of her peers is that she has a built-in securities expert witness; he’s Ms. Stoneman’s husband – Douglas J. Schulz   (Invest Securities Consulting).  This is an invaluable resource because lawyers don’t necessary know the intricacies of the securities business.  They were trained in law; not securities.  Though Ms. Stoneman uses other experts for the arbitration hearings, having her own expert available 24/7 is incredibly helpful.  Ms. Stoneman’s decades of experience representing investors and stockbrokers, as well as her built-in expert make for an extremely competent advocate.


Ms. Stoneman is located in Colorado and Texas, although she represents clients all over the country.  Arbitrations are unique in that everything that happens takes place online, over the telephone or through the mail.  Travel is required only if the case proceeds to arbitration, and most cases settle.  As a result, Ms. Stoneman has represented many clients she has never met.  Except but in a few states, arbitration lawyers don’t need to be licensed in the state where the arbitration is held (almost always the investor’s residence.)  When Ms. Stoneman gets a case in one of the states that requires local counsel, she calls on the many contacts she has developed in her 24+ years in this business and works out arrangements do not adversely affect the fee the client pays. 


Ms. Stoneman's special skills include superb client contact, writing skills, and oral presentation. She is regarded in the industry as enthusiastic and aggressive. Ms. Stoneman maintains a small firm because she recognizes that for many, even hiring a lawyer can be intimidating.  Rather than shuffling you to a junior, less experienced attorney, as some attorneys do, Ms. Stoneman is accessible at virtually all times and will be the only person handling your case.  There are a number of firms that specialize in securities arbitration.  But far too often, through their marketing efforts, these firms generate a large number of leads and potential cases.  Clients are often simply a number in a large base of cases.  Not so with Ms. Stoneman.  She purposefully keeps her case load small so that her clients receive the best representation possible. 


It is critical that the attorney you hire have experience in securities arbitrations. Even an experienced "trial attorney" can be a fish out of water in a securities arbitration. A different set of rules applies than in court. Client preparation is paramount - in a court case, the parties tell their story more than once - once in a deposition and then again at trial. Not so in securities arbitrations, because depositions are rarely allowed. It is critical that your attorney properly prepare the client for the sometimes tricky and deceitful onslaught of questions by opposing counsel. It is also paramount for your attorney to be in command of all of the facts of your case. Only then will your attorney be able to think quickly on her feet to formulate questions and respond in the arbitration. Ms. Stoneman excels in this area and feels that if a lawyer doesn't have the time, the ability or the inclination to represent a client fully and completely in these ways, then the case should not be taken.  It is this individualized attention to clients and cases that allows Ms. Stoneman to maximize the positive results she obtains for clients. 

 View/Print Ms. Stoneman's Resume  




Since Utah borders Colorado, and I live in Colorado, I am more familiar with its securities laws and regulations and Utah arbitrators. Because arbitrators are from the state or region where the investor resides, my familiarity with the arbitrator roster and individual arbitrators in Utah and surrounding states is a significant benefit. And remember that I do not need to be licensed in the state of Utah in order to represent Utah investors in securities arbitrations. I don’t even need to affiliate with local counsel.  I also have the benefit of the knowledge of my husband Douglas Schulz (www.securitiesexpert.com), who has been hired in over 1,140 securities related matters and testified in over 637 FINRA arbitrations and civil cases regarding investment and brokerage disputes. Because the majority of his expert work is also in Colorado and surrounding states, he too is very familiar with Utah securities arbitrators and arbitrations. 

Securities misconduct comes in many different forms and every case is different. Sometimes, brokers churn accounts. Churning is the excessive buying and selling of securities for the purpose of generating commissions. Other times, brokers misrepresent or omit the risks of securities. Most frequently, brokers sell unsuitable securities to investors.

Utah investors are protected by legislative statutes, both federal and state, but also by industry rules promulgated by FINRA and the SEC that prohibit brokers from engaging in churning, unauthorized trading, fraud, unsuitable sales, and other forms of misconduct. Below are useful links and resources covering some of the investor protections available in the State of Utah.

  • The Department of Commerce, Securities Division (link is https://securities.utah.gov/) - The Utah Division of Securities is the state agency that regulates the securities (investment) industry in Utah and enforces its securities laws. The Division attempts to ensure minimum standards of competency in the brokerage industry and attempts to ensure fair-dealing by issuing licenses to broker-dealers and investment advisers that do business in the State of Utah. In addition, Utah’s Securities Division’s mission includes a mandate to educate investors in Utah.

The Utah Division of Securities states on its “For Investors” page the following:

 Before You Invest

·         Research the Investment Opportunity

·         Verify parties have the appropriate Licenses

·         Ask Questions and Keep Notes

I have a problem with these bullet points, because they may lead investors to believe that if they DON’T do these things, they don’t have a case.  WRONG!!!

 Investors have no obligation to research investments their stockbrokers recommend or to verify that their stockbroker has the appropriate licenses.  Rather, investors are entitled to rely upon what their stockbroker says about the investment and assume that their broker has the appropriate licenses (particularly if they work at an established broker-dealer). Likewise, investors have no legal obligation to ask questions!  It’s the broker who is obligated to ask questions of the investor. 


Now, are these three things advisable and prudent to do?  Sure, but I will just say that in the hundreds of clients I have represented with excellent results, none of them did any of the above things. 

 I love the following graphic on the Utah Division of Securities website:


 The Utah Securities Act (link is https://le.utah.gov/xcode/Title61/Chapter1/61-1.html ) is a state law regulating the securities industry. The Act contains provisions for the registration of securities, exemptions and sanctions for violations.

Stoneman Law represents investors in all major Utah cities including Salt Lake City, West Valley City, Provo, West Jordan, Orem, Sandy, Ogden, St. George, Layton, and Taylorsville. Our consultations are free of charge and the firm is only compensated if you recover.

Where Do FINRA Arbitrations Take Place in Utah?

All arbitrations for Utah residents take place in Salt Lake City.

And remember that arbitrations take place in the state where the investor resides, NOT where the brokerage firm or stockbroker office!!


 Utah Securities News


October 31, 2017. A St. George financial adviser pleaded guilty Monday to defrauding clients of millions of dollars while teaching them fraudulent investment strategies to avoid paying taxes.

According to a news release from the Utah District of the U.S. attorney’s office, Henry Seth Brock, 64, admitted to tax evasion, securities fraud and wire fraud for his role in the scheme.


Brock founded a financial services company eight years ago and served as its president until this year, the release says. As president, he marketed and sold the “IRA Exit Strategy” to potential investors, which he told them was a way to avoid paying taxes on IRA withdrawals.

 Brock’s business issued tax forms to his clients, falsely representing that they had invested in his business and incurred losses, which offset the clients’ tax liability. “As a result, Brock caused clients to file fraudulent income tax returns claiming a total of approximately $3.8 million in bogus business losses and resulting in a tax loss of over $1.1 million,” the release says.


I believe that the moral of this story is to be very wary of doing business with small companies and if you do, check out the registration and disciplinary history of all personnel at FINRA.org!  the Brock used to be a licensed broker until 2003 when he was barred by the Utah Division of Securities for “acting as an unlicensed broker-dealer agent,” among other things. He did what so many tainted or barred stockbrokers do when they can no longer work in the industry: they operate on the fringes, giving quasi financial advice.  Any of the recent victims of Brock’s schemes could have learned what I just told you by simply typing Brock’s name into the following spot right on the home page of FINRA.org:



I firmly believe that investors have no legal obligation to investigate their stockbrokers or financial advisors, however, it is now easier than ever to pull up detailed information about your stockbroker, including prior customer complaints.